Media may be restricted from live coverage in emergency
Published on Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 20:29 in Nation » India section
Tags: Mumbai Terror Attack, Taj Hotel , Mumbai



Related Stories
India unprepared against terror threats: PM 
Chidambaram sets two goals to fight terrorism 
Pak 'official agencies' likely involved in Mumbai strike: PM
Girl abducted from outside mall in Noida, alleges rape
War on Terror: Israel's the way to go with Pak? 
Four terrorists dead, Poonch encounter far from over
Call centre employee swindles caller of Rs 47 lakh 
Sania says she's fit, ready for Hong Kong tournament 
Azhar's son to try out for Kolkata Knight Riders 
Bipasha Basu touches 30, and age of serious roles
Mumbai: Amid concerns that the media coverage of the Mumbai terror attack may have hampered the operation against terrorists, Maharashtra government is considering restricting the news channels from showing live such incidents.
"The government is mulling the issue of putting some restrictions on live coverage during an emergency situation," a senior official from Home Department told PTI.
The channels were, in fact, banned for some time on the second day of the siege by police as they said it helped terrorists, who were in touch with their masters through phone, to keep a tab on the movement of the commandos who were not only fighting the ultras but also rescuing people.
But the coverage was resumed after some time and continued till the end of the operation.
Later, it was confirmed from phone intercepts between the terrorists and their "masters across the border" that the incessant live coverage of the operation aided masterminds of the audacious terror strikes to coordinate their movements.
The matter came for discussion at a high level meeting of the state Government held after the terror attacks in the city. The suggestion has taken for consideration in order to strengthen the security norms, he said.
"In fact, the suggestion to either ban or restrict channels from displaying live images came from many politicians," he said.
| Ads by Google |
| Related Ads: | |
















Read Comment | Post Comment
Showing live of operation is not good as it may hamper the process. They can show the recorded version later.
Read Comment
Good Move. Dont anybody think the live coverage was a bit overdone? For example, almost at the same time, 177
Read Comment
Judiciary and the media are the only two things which are officially independent in India.. The kind of work the
Read Comment
If the media's role has become exactly the opposite of what it should be, then why the delay? Implement the
Read Comment
This is necessary in view of the TV news channels in their over excitement to reveal what was happening in
Read Comment
Read more comment »